Number theory
WithdrawnWithdrawn 8 Sept 2026
QUARANTINE_INCOMPLETE_CLAIM (A public claim advertises reciprocal-sum convergence, exactly part iii, but its discussion identifies an assumed growth_ineq axiom and requests the missing block-growth argument. It does not constitute an unconditional proof. Conservatively withhold the target while the underlying claim is unresolved; do not describe it as solved.)
Formal statement
Proof target
import FormalConjectures.ErdosProblems.«12»
import TaskSupport
namespace Bounty
theorem target : fcTypeOfName% "Erdos12.erdos_12.parts.iii" := by
sorry
end Bounty
Original conjecture (Lean type)
True ↔ ∀ (A : Set ℕ), Erdos12.IsGood A → Summable fun n => 1 / ↑↑nOriginal conjecture source: FormalConjectures/ErdosProblems/12.lean
References
Something wrong with this formalization?
A statement that does not faithfully capture the original conjecture is the one real risk here, so we would rather hear about it early - before someone spends weeks on it.
Our channel is in the Bittensor Discord server. Join the server first, then open the channel to send your report.