Number theory
$4,996 bountynobody has started
Nobody has attempted this. A complete proof or refutation takes the whole bounty.
Even one lemma helps. Whoever finishes this later shares the pool with everyone who got them there.
contrib new erdos-323-variants-k-gt-2Command line, then a pull request on GitHub.
Nothing has been published against this problem yet.
A first lemma is worth as much as a last one: whoever closes the problem shares the pool with everyone who got them there.
conjectures-tasks
The pinned statement, the Lean challenge file and the exact bundle you build against.
pool/tier-1/erdos-323-variants-k-gt-2-formalized →
conjectures-contribution
Every published piece for this problem, with its Lean source and its signed record.
contributions/erdos-323-variants-k-gt-2 →
Formal statement
Proof target
import FormalConjectures.ErdosProblems.«323»
import TaskSupport
namespace Bounty
theorem target : fcTypeOfName% "Erdos323.erdos_323.variants.k_gt_2" := by
sorry
end Bounty
Original conjecture (Lean type)
True ↔ ∀ k > 2, (fun x => ↑(Erdos323.f k k x)) =o[Filter.atTop] fun x => ↑xOriginal conjecture source: FormalConjectures/ErdosProblems/323.lean
References
Something wrong with this formalization?
A statement that does not faithfully capture the original conjecture is the one real risk here, so we would rather hear about it early - before someone spends weeks on it.
Our channel is in the Bittensor Discord server. Join the server first, then open the channel to send your report.