Geometry
Approved
The accepted file establishes a result about a faulty formal statement. It does not settle the intended mathematical problem. The recorded review explains the mismatch.
Submitted by 5GbYxU…yUxBzW
Withdrawn 6 Aug 2026
SOURCE_MISMATCH + EXPLOITABLE + SOLVED (SatisfiesCohnElkiesScheme omits continuity of f, so f 0 may be set at a single null point independently of fHat f 0 and any positive bound is attainable; submission aa57d955 exhibited a Gaussian modified only at the origin)
Read the recorded decisionFormal statement
Proof target
import FormalConjectures.GreensOpenProblems.«42»
import TaskSupport
namespace Bounty
theorem target : fcTypeOfName% "Green42.green_42" := by
sorry
end Bounty
Original conjecture (Lean type)
True ↔ Green42.CohnElkiesOptimal 2 (√3 / 6)Original conjecture source: FormalConjectures/GreensOpenProblems/42.lean
References
Something wrong with this formalization?
A statement that does not faithfully capture the original conjecture is the one real risk here, so we would rather hear about it early - before someone spends weeks on it.
Our channel is in the Bittensor Discord server. Join the server first, then open the channel to send your report.